TiVoCommunity.com
(c)opyright 1995-2005 All rights reserved
indexcheckTC
This area is a static history of posts in the TiVo Community Forum Archive.
This archive history was made for the simple indexing of search sites like
Google.
quote:
Originally posted by old7
Ever notice most posters with Doom & Gloom predictions have fewer than 20 posts.
quote:
Originally posted by freddyf a week ago
I think I'll just forget about tivo.
I totally don't get the phone line requirement.
Thanks for the help.
quote:
the idiot who wrote that failed to mention that they were cash flow positive the last quarter.
Samo, let's dissect your post one sentence at a time:quote:
Originally posted by samo
This "idiot" did mention that in the article as well as bringing your attention to the fact that EBITDA means nothing for dot.com quality stocks. He didn't mentioned that, my you may want to know that net loss from operations this quarter was $11.5 million (total net loss was $32 million) with gross profit only $206,000 higher than a year ago. Subscription sales were about 15% higher at a cost of $5 million in rebates and subsidies vs no subsidies a year ago. As mentioned in article, most of the savings compare to the year ago came from sales and marketing (about $23 million). You may want to read TiVo 8-K instead of PR release if you want to know facts about financial conditions of the company.
Absolutely true that EBITDA has to be looked at very carefully to figure out whether it makes sense. Here, we've been talking about cash-flow. The main difference between the $11.5M operating loss and the $2M Adjusted EBITDA gain is how accounting for lifetime subs is done (over a four year period vs counting it immediately). In terms of cash-flow it makes sense to count lifetimes immediately, since they plan to continue having new lifetime subs.quote:
Originally posted by samo
This "idiot" did mention that in the article as well as bringing your attention to the fact that EBITDA means nothing for dot.com quality stocks.
You don't mention that income for the quarter more than doubled; from $6.7M to $13.7M. But of that extra income, $5.2M was subtracted for rebates this year. Because of accounting regulations, rebates are directly subtracted from revenue, where as advertising (which is what TiVo did last year, instead) is subtracted later and doesn't affect gross profit. Comparing apples with apples, TiVo had a gross profit of $5.4M more than last year.quote:
He didn't mentioned that, my you may want to know that net loss from operations this quarter was $11.5 million (total net loss was $32 million) with gross profit only $206,000 higher than a year ago.
So what you're saying here is that TiVo spent $5.2M on rebates this year instead of $23M on advertising last year, and got a 15% sales increase over last year? Granted it would be nice if it were more; but that bang for buck doesn't sound too bad.quote:
Subscription sales were about 15% higher at a cost of $5 million in rebates and subsidies vs no subsidies a year ago. As mentioned in article, most of the savings compare to the year ago came from sales and marketing (about $23 million).
I did.quote:
You may want to read TiVo 8-K instead of PR release if you want to know facts about financial conditions of the company.
Well you can't ignore it. Like the guy who fell off the ten story building, after falling nine floors he said "Hey this isn't so bad after all." Cash flow's got to improve. (It is actually.) Don't get me wrong, I want TiVo to survive more than anybody, but profitability is a BIG part of that. The likelihood IMO is a takeover.quote:
Originally posted by Mars Rocket
These posts are hilarious. There's a been a doom & gloom post about cash flow problems pretty much every quarter for the past 3 years.
And you want to be in the Beta program. Lots of luck!quote:
Originally posted by sambeckett
if tivo goes under we will all get refunds. class action lawsuit, and I'll have my Credit card to refund the charges.
so i hope they go under. MS has nicer looking stuff anyway
we are all going to have dumb dvrs in a year :p
This is an asinine statement. It assumes zero revenue for the next year! Not even profit... just revenue!quote:
Originally posted by freddyf
But with less than $44 million of cash left on the balance sheet, and a burn rate that ran at $35 million in the nine months through October, the only way that cash is going to last more than a year
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2009
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser
Modified by Adam J. de Jaray