TiVoCommunity.com
(c)opyright 1995-2005 All rights reserved
indexcheckTC
This area is a static history of posts in the TiVo Community Forum Archive.
This archive history was made for the simple indexing of search sites like
Google.
Here's what I infer from the press release and general knowledge about CBS-HD.quote:
Originally posted by smak
A few questions.
1. No mention of which bird CBS-HD will be on yet, right. Is it possible it could go on the main bird?
And if so, what equipment would you need to receive it?
2. There's not going to be 17 HD CBS's, which feed will it be?
3. If it's a timeslot with a non-HD show what will be on CBS-HD?
4. Everything except the HD channel is the same right. When they say they are carrying all the MTV channels, and CBS and UPN analog, that's just a re-upping of the deal, no new channels right?
I wouldn't expect there to be any issue there, though it may require you subscribe to the HD package to get this station, or maybe you have to buy CBS distant networks, or a combination. They didn't say much about that. I'd lean towards it being part of the HD package. Does Pegasus let you buy the HD programming package?quote:
Originally posted by tfederov
Another question.... what about us Pegasus people?
quote:
Originally posted by smak
Ok, if it's on the main dish, I still need the HD receiver and the triple LNB?
-smak-
quote:
Originally posted by Oknarf
The question is: will the channel just magically show up before the CSR's get wind of this or do you think I'll actually hear back from someone in India first?
quote:
Originally posted by rcwalters
I'm a newbie on all this, and I thought I understood it all, but now I'm confused. :(
I live in the Atlanta area where local stations are available on satellite. I'm on cable now, but with the new HDTiVo, I plan to switch to D* in the next six months or so, depending on when the magic device is actually available.
Now, as I thought I understood it, I could get D*, pay $10.99, and get HD feeds of ESPN, ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox national, plus then I could get the SD feeds of the same for locals.
Or I could save the $10.99 and use an OTA antenna to get HD locals, but not ESPN HD.
But now this CBS-HD SuperBowl thing makes me wonder what can I get on D* that is in HD? Some of these posts cause me to think that because I get locals over D*, I lose the HD feeds of the same networks. What's the real deal here? Do I get two channels each of the networks, one national HD and one local SD, or do I just get local SD via D*?
quote:
As of right now, there are NO network feeds available in HD. CBS-HD is coming soon (based on the press release today) for those who live in CBS owned and operated cities. This service will be free of charge if you sub to the Local Channels in your area. The release did not mention whether or not you can pay for this service if you do not live in a O&O city.
HD networks (and other local channels) are available to a significant number of people over-the-air; which is how the DirecTV HD TiVo unit can obtain them, and record them. Similarly that's how the Dish Network 921 DVR unit works, too.quote:
Originally posted by rcwalters
I'm stunned. You mean that if I wanted HD networks, I have to either go with cable, or an OTA tuner. Why would anybody be on D* now then??
The only reason I would go to satellite is for the HD TiVo that doesn't work on cable...and now it turns out I still would only get ESPN HD and Discovery HD anyway, huh?
I'm simply amazed at the ridiculous disarray of the whole televisioning landscape right now.
If I want TiVo, I can't have HD. After March, If I want TiVo and HD, I have to get DirecTV, but that doesn't provide network HD, so I have to get an antenna, which is what I could be doing already except as already mentioned, no TiVo for that.
Well, I guess that solves my whole dilemma of should I replace my fuzzy ten-year-old 52" with a snazzy 65"....heckles no! There's NOTHING to be gained right now. What a bummer.
Why is it so complicated...my cable delivers HD, so make a SA HD TiVo for cable, all problems solved. </rant>
quote:
Originally posted by rcwalters
If I want TiVo, I can't have HD. After March, If I want TiVo and HD, I have to get DirecTV, but that doesn't provide network HD, so I have to get an antenna, which is what I could be doing already except as already mentioned, no TiVo for that.
quote:
Originally posted by forecheck
The new HD DirecTV TiVo will record from both the satellite and digital broadcasts from an antenna. And like their current HD receivers, all the guide data and channels will be in the same guide, so you can seemlessly surf from your local channels from the antenna and the satellite channels without even knowing where the source of the channel is coming from.
quote:
Originally posted by shaydj
As I see it now:
4 HD channels (ESPNHD, DISHD, HDNET, HDNETM) = $10.99.
I can still get HBOHD without paying $10.99 as long as I buy HBO service.
I can still get local channels in HD using OTA without paying $10.99 as long as I have an HD antenna.
I can now get CBS HD without paying $10.99 as long as I buy directv's local channels package.
Is this all true?
If so why in the world would I pay $10.99 for crappy programming like HDNET and 6 hrs per week of HD programming on ESPN?
quote:
Originally posted by shaydj
As I see it now:
4 HD channels (ESPNHD, DISHD, HDNET, HDNETM) = $10.99.
I can still get HBOHD without paying $10.99 as long as I buy HBO service.
I can still get local channels in HD using OTA without paying $10.99 as long as I have an HD antenna.
I can now get CBS HD without paying $10.99 as long as I buy directv's local channels package.
Is this all true?
If so why in the world would I pay $10.99 for crappy programming like HDNET and 6 hrs per week of HD programming on ESPN?
quote:
Originally posted by Warp
Welcome to the bleeding edge, rcwalters.
quote:
Originally posted by rcwalters
Thanks. But that's just it--in my opinion, this ought not to be the bleeding edge by now. It's 2003....my bad...2004, and this ought to be standard-fare offerings by now. TiVo has been aware that HD monitors and HD programming was available for how long now ? Why hasn't the cable HD TiVo been out for a while already? As I understand it, there are non-TiVo DVR's for cable already.
For specific cable systems, contracted by those cable systems, utilizing specific decoding mechanisms for that cable system, probably protected by the set-top manufacturer that's making the PVR in the first place.quote:
Originally posted by rcwalters
As I understand it, there are non-TiVo DVR's for cable already.
quote:
Why hasn't the cable HD TiVo been out for a while already?
There is now, and the FCC is requiring cable companies to comply with it. It won't happen overnight, but that is the direction everything is headed. See http://www.opencable.com/ for info.quote:
Originally posted by cneth
Maybe someday there will be a common standard for cable boxes and their authorization systems, but so far that hasn't happened...
quote:
Originally posted by shaydj
As I see it now:
4 HD channels (ESPNHD, DISHD, HDNET, HDNETM) = $10.99.
I can still get HBOHD without paying $10.99 as long as I buy HBO service.
I can still get local channels in HD using OTA without paying $10.99 as long as I have an HD antenna.
I can now get CBS HD without paying $10.99 as long as I buy directv's local channels package.
Is this all true?
If so why in the world would I pay $10.99 for crappy programming like HDNET and 6 hrs per week of HD programming on ESPN?
quote:
Originally posted by rcwalters
I'm stunned. You mean that if I wanted HD networks, I have to either go with cable, or an OTA tuner. Why would anybody be on D* now then??
The only reason I would go to satellite is for the HD TiVo that doesn't work on cable...and now it turns out I still would only get ESPN HD and Discovery HD anyway, huh?
I'm simply amazed at the ridiculous disarray of the whole televisioning landscape right now.
If I want TiVo, I can't have HD. After March, If I want TiVo and HD, I have to get DirecTV, but that doesn't provide network HD, so I have to get an antenna, which is what I could be doing already except as already mentioned, no TiVo for that.
Well, I guess that solves my whole dilemma of should I replace my fuzzy ten-year-old 52" with a snazzy 65"....heckles no! There's NOTHING to be gained right now. What a bummer.
Why is it so complicated...my cable delivers HD, so make a SA HD TiVo for cable, all problems solved. </rant>
quote:
Originally posted by smak
A few questions.
2. There's not going to be 17 HD CBS's, which feed will it be?
-smak-
That's sort of annoying, really. I hope it turns out to be a generalization and in reality those of us already getting and paying for CBS-East and CBS-West distants will get both of them.quote:
Originally posted by GadgetFreak
Customers in Pacific and Mountain time zones will get KCBS from LA, and customers in Central and Eastern zones will get WCBS from NY.
Are you sure about this, or just guessing? (I was hoping it would be WCBS-DT for everyone since I can already get KCBS-DT just fine. Only WCBS also makes sense from a bandwidth point of view.)quote:
Originally posted by GadgetFreak
Customers in Pacific and Mountain time zones will get KCBS from LA, and customers in Central and Eastern zones will get WCBS from NY.
quote:
Originally posted by jdk
It's in the press release:
http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/about...?id=01_08_2004D
Both KCBS and WCBS. With the shipping of the HD-DVR, I think the bandwith is better saved by just sending out an east coast feed.
..
code:
Eastern 1,083,030 0.999% #23 Baltimore, MD 2,391,830 2.206% #6 Boston, MA 1,923,230 1.774% #10 Detroit, MI 1,510,740 1.394% #17 Miami, FL 7,376,330 6.804% #1 New York, NY 2,874,330 2.651% #4 Philadelphia, PA 1,175,410 1.084% #22 Pittsburgh, PA ---------------------- 18,334,900 16.912% Central 577,740 0.533% #54 Austin, TX 3,399,460 3.136% #3 Chicago, IL 2,255,970 2.081% #7 Dallas, TX 89,600 0.083% #178 Marquette, WI 1,635,650 1.509% #14 Minneapolis, MN 426,820 0.394% #68 Green Bay, WI ---------------------- 8,385,240 7.736% Mountain 1,399,100 1.291% #18 Denver, CO 786,030 0.725% #36 Salt Lake City, UT ---------------------- 2,185,130 2.016% Pacific 5,402,260 4.983% #2 Los Angeles, CA 2,440,920 2.252% #5 San Francisco, CA ---------------------- 7,843,180 7.235% TOTAL ---------------------- 36,748,450 33.899%
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2010
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser
Modified by Adam J. de Jaray